The Sources and Principles of the Rule of Law


If you’re interested in the law, you might want to learn about the sources and principles of the Rule of Law. You’ll also learn about the enactment process and the impact of judicial decisions on citizens. These topics are essential for understanding law. However, before you begin learning about the sources and principles of the Rule of Law, you should first familiarize yourself with some key terms and concepts.

Principles of the Rule of Law

The Rule of Law is a concept that is rooted in our constitutional system. It refers to the establishment of a legal system with strong institutions. It is a key part of a democratic society. There are many benefits of having a Rule of Law, but there are also many drawbacks. The Rule of Law leads to legalism and overbureaucratization. It also damages personal and professional relationships.

In principle, the rule of law requires that those in power exercise their power according to the norms of society. It also requires that the government operate within a legal framework and answer to citizens through the rule of law if there is suspicion that it is acting illegally.

Sources of law

Sources of law refer to the various sources that are used to create legal rules. These sources include statutes and court decisions. Some sources are mandatory, such as the constitution of a nation, and others are persuasive. The state constitution is an example of a persuasive source. It is found online, and is the foundation document of the government in Minnesota.

Case law is another important source of law. This is created by judges when they decide facts in a legal case. This type of law is state and federal law, and has its origins in English common law.

Process of enacting laws

The process of enacting laws begins with the introduction of a bill to the legislature. The bill is then assigned to a committee and studied. It is then put on the calendar for a vote in both the House and Senate. If it is approved by either chamber, the bill then goes to a conference committee to work out any differences. Once this is done, it returns to the House and Senate for final approval.

Ordinary bills are introduced in Parliament by a member or Minister, who reads the bill’s objectives and title. The bill then goes through the committee and general discussion stages before it becomes law. At each stage, members discuss the bill and add or delete clauses.

Impact of judicial decisions on citizens

Judicial decisions have a profound effect on the lives of ordinary citizens. They shape public policies, and they can lead to political turmoil or improve public relations. However, in some cases, judicial decisions are not made in the best interests of citizens. For example, one high-profile case, Citizens United, found that the United States Supreme Court erred in favor of wealthy donors. This decision has been widely discussed, and has had a profound impact on congressional races. It also raised concerns about the integrity of state judicial elections.

This article advances a model of judicial behavior that takes the political context into account. The strategic model suggests that judges may act against the government to maintain judicial control over the constitutional order. Such decisions may be motivated by judicial preferences that protect the regime or individual rights. In such cases, judges may also abstain from annulling laws that violate individual rights.